Human Talk: Service Hoops

Frustrated Customer: Stupid FAQ Page

Today’s Human Talk comes straight from a Chris Brogan rant:

Dear companies providing customer service:

Yes, I know it’s cheaper that I use your website, and I’m really smart, so normally your website might even be a viable option, even though it’s laid out like crap, and it’s not exactly intuitive, and it doesn’t answer questions the way I wish they would be asked.

Yes, I understand that you’d MUCH rather I go through 400 steps on your Interactive Voice Response Unit and decide which chute to traverse, and sometimes, I can navigate that and get done what needs doing (best in class for useful IVRs, in case you’re wondering, is American Express), but sometimes I cannot.

PLEASE DON’T MAKE IT HARD FOR ME TO TALK TO A HUMAN OR I WILL BE MIGHTY ANGRY.

This morning, this means T-Mobile. Don’t make it hard for me to get done what needs doing. Don’t hide stuff on your site. Don’t make me BEG for humans.

Customer service NEEDS to evolve. Because just as Google is your *real* home page, Customer Service are your *real* best opportunities to keep me happy with you, NOT a bolt-on cost center.

Sounds like a passionate call for Human Talk to me.

What about Live Chat?

Website Live Chat HelpThis has me wondering what the general consensus is on Live Chat as a form of customer service. In this instance, I’m talking about the websites provide a form of in-site chat as a form of customer service. (Although, I’m a believer in seeking to provide help to consumers on their turf via Twitter, Blogs, etc.)

My experience with live chat has been consistently pleasant. It seems that I usually get the answers I’m looking seemingly fast, especially when you compare the method to the usual customer service phone call. And if a portion of a companies customer service has been outsourced, I’ve found that Live Chat can take some of the language and cultural barriers off the table. Most of us are used to shorthand methods used when texting and chatting online, so what can sometimes come across as broken English on the phone, may seem like the norm via Live Chat.

One downside to Live Chat is the lack of emotion that this communication method provides. Where a customer service rep on the phone could detect emotions through the tone and volume of the conversation, this can be hard (if not impossible) with Live Chat.

What are your opinions on Live Chat?

Phone or Live Chat, which one do you prefer?

Chris Brogan, I didn’t see any option for Live Chat on T-Mobile’s website. Would you have used this method if T-Mobile offered it?

——

This post is part of the Human Talk series. 

If you would like to contribute your good or bad Human Talk examples, Email me. I’ll accept photos, stories, videos, audio, etc. and give credit where credit is due.



New to The Fresh Peel?

Logo Mashups & Swap Test

Logo Mashups

Comunicadores has put together some humorous logo mashups. (Via: ToddAnd)

I don’t know about you, but even though I find these funny, I feel a slight bit of uneasiness and tension as well. It’s like the left side of my brain is telling me that something isn’t right.

These logos have passed The Swap Test.

In The Brand Gap, Marty Neumeier introduces a simple test to check out the effectiveness of your logo.

Swap part of your icon—the name or the visual element—with that of a competing brand from another category. If the resulting icon is better, or no worse than it was, your existing icon has room for improvement. By that same token, no other company should be able to improve its icon by using part of yours. A good brand icon is like a tailored suit—it should only look good on you.

Does your logo pass the test?

The Brand Gap Logo Swap Test

 

 

Women In the Driver’s Seat

Woman in Car

When it comes to long trips, I’ve always been better at sleeping than driving. There’s something about a moving vehicle that rocks me to sleep. I’m almost certain that my parents must have used the “strap the kid into their car seat and drive them around the block until they fall asleep” method when I was a baby (despite their adamant denials).

Now whenever it’s time to head out on a road trip, my wife is usually the one behind the wheel a majority of the time. This is something that our parents had trouble understanding at first, because in their time the man was always the one behind the wheel, in control.

In the last 20 years, the role of women has been rapidly transformed. Sadly though, many misconceptions are still exist about women, and missing the mark.

Mark Penn is credited with the discovery of the “soccer moms” demographic during the 1st round of Clinton campaigning years ago. More recently in his book Microtrends, he points out that these soccer moms have evolved and are taking on more decision making roles in families, calling them “car-buying soccer moms.”

Michele Miller drove this point home yesterday, with Four Fallacies About Female Consumers, some statistics further proving the new role of women.

When it comes consumer electronics, women just don’t get it.

In 2007, the Consumer Electronics Associated reported that women outspent men on wireless gadgets and gizmos - $55 billion vs. $41 billion.

Women don’t purchase real estate unless they part of a couple or have a family.

The latest statistics from the National Board of Realtors show that in the last two years, 22 percent of all home purchases were made by single women.

Women aren’t into sports cars.

60% of BMW Z4 drivers are women.

Women can’t stand video games.

World of Warcraft, the mecca of global online gaming, reports that 30% of its ten million members are women. 

Do you know who’s driving your brand?