<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Human Talk: You&#8217;re Human, So Talk Like One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freshpeel.com/2008/01/human-talk-youre-human-so-talk-like-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freshpeel.com/2008/01/human-talk-youre-human-so-talk-like-one/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:47:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Valley PR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Valley PR Blog&#8217;s Weekend Reading 01-25-08</title>
		<link>http://freshpeel.com/2008/01/human-talk-youre-human-so-talk-like-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>Valley PR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Valley PR Blog&#8217;s Weekend Reading 01-25-08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freshpeel.com/2008/01/human-talk-youre-human-so-talk-like-one/#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>[...] Youâ€™re a Human So Talk Like One &#8211; Well said(!) by Chris Wilson at Fresh Peel . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Youâ€™re a Human So Talk Like One &#8211; Well said(!) by Chris Wilson at Fresh Peel . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valley PR Blog's Weekend Reading for the week ending 01-25-08 &#124; Valley PR Blog</title>
		<link>http://freshpeel.com/2008/01/human-talk-youre-human-so-talk-like-one/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Valley PR Blog's Weekend Reading for the week ending 01-25-08 &#124; Valley PR Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freshpeel.com/2008/01/human-talk-youre-human-so-talk-like-one/#comment-402</guid>
		<description>[...] Youâ€™re a Human So Talk Like One &#8211; Well said(!) by Chris Wilson at Fresh Peel . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Youâ€™re a Human So Talk Like One &#8211; Well said(!) by Chris Wilson at Fresh Peel . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marketing and PR News and Ideas, January 23, 2008</title>
		<link>http://freshpeel.com/2008/01/human-talk-youre-human-so-talk-like-one/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing and PR News and Ideas, January 23, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freshpeel.com/2008/01/human-talk-youre-human-so-talk-like-one/#comment-382</guid>
		<description>[...] You&#8217;re Human, So Talk Like One - Chris Wilson launches a series of posts called Human Talk, about why it seems so hard for people and companies to, you know, communicate in a way that doesn&#8217;t resemble a robot. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You&#8217;re Human, So Talk Like One &#8211; Chris Wilson launches a series of posts called Human Talk, about why it seems so hard for people and companies to, you know, communicate in a way that doesn&#8217;t resemble a robot. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Wilson</title>
		<link>http://freshpeel.com/2008/01/human-talk-youre-human-so-talk-like-one/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freshpeel.com/2008/01/human-talk-youre-human-so-talk-like-one/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

Awesome insight! I&#039;m tempted to rip your acronym off and call it my own. TRUE: truthful, relevant, unique and engaging. Pure brilliance.

It&#039;s amazing how many processes (even some creative ones), that are meant to make messages more clear, seem to just muddy the waters even more.

Thanks for the conversation Brand Chef!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>Awesome insight! I&#8217;m tempted to rip your acronym off and call it my own. TRUE: truthful, relevant, unique and engaging. Pure brilliance.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how many processes (even some creative ones), that are meant to make messages more clear, seem to just muddy the waters even more.</p>
<p>Thanks for the conversation Brand Chef!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew B. Clark</title>
		<link>http://freshpeel.com/2008/01/human-talk-youre-human-so-talk-like-one/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew B. Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freshpeel.com/2008/01/human-talk-youre-human-so-talk-like-one/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Chris - 

I have to say, you hit the nail right on the head.  Being in the communication industry (Advertising, marketing), I get so frustrated when clients send brand driven (I could say &quot;conversational&quot;) copy points through such a review process that it takes their end user out of the equation all together.  I fight with this about 70% of the time; especially when legal and liability control gets to rear its ugly head.

If the conversation, whether in copy, dialogged, or pictographs follows TRUE (Truthful, relevant, unique and engaging) branding, then the specifics, including legal, should be covered.

If you&#039;re communicating to your {enter audience here}, then speak to them in words, tone, temper and timber that will make them comfortable.  Otherwise you might as well start clicking and beeping like a telex machine...  Any way you look at it, eyes gloss over and you&#039;re lost.

Great topic.  I look forward to reading more.

Keep Cooking!
Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; </p>
<p>I have to say, you hit the nail right on the head.  Being in the communication industry (Advertising, marketing), I get so frustrated when clients send brand driven (I could say &#8220;conversational&#8221;) copy points through such a review process that it takes their end user out of the equation all together.  I fight with this about 70% of the time; especially when legal and liability control gets to rear its ugly head.</p>
<p>If the conversation, whether in copy, dialogged, or pictographs follows TRUE (Truthful, relevant, unique and engaging) branding, then the specifics, including legal, should be covered.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re communicating to your {enter audience here}, then speak to them in words, tone, temper and timber that will make them comfortable.  Otherwise you might as well start clicking and beeping like a telex machine&#8230;  Any way you look at it, eyes gloss over and you&#8217;re lost.</p>
<p>Great topic.  I look forward to reading more.</p>
<p>Keep Cooking!<br />
Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
